xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: please help me! thanks

To: Chris Wedgwood <cw@xxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: please help me! thanks
From: Matthias Schniedermeyer <ms@xxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 29 Nov 2009 10:39:03 +0100
Cc: givemefile@xxxxxxxx, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20091129020258.GA5168@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <20091128033325.5032D5C121@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20091128184250.GA30986@xxxxxxx> <20091129020258.GA5168@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.19 (2009-01-05)
On 28.11.2009 18:02, Chris Wedgwood wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 28, 2009 at 07:42:50PM +0100, Matthias Schniedermeyer wrote:
> 
> > .el5 smells like Red Hat, Red Hat doesn't do XFS.
> > At least in nothing that is currently released AFAIR.
> 
> 5.4 has XFS

I googled 5.4 and found a CERT that mentions 2.6.18-164.
So i guess minimum kernel for 5.4 is way more recent than -128.

So OP appears that have a pre 5.4 release running.





Bis denn

-- 
Real Programmers consider "what you see is what you get" to be just as 
bad a concept in Text Editors as it is in women. No, the Real Programmer
wants a "you asked for it, you got it" text editor -- complicated, 
cryptic, powerful, unforgiving, dangerous.

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>