| To: | Chris Wedgwood <cw@xxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: please help me! thanks |
| From: | Matthias Schniedermeyer <ms@xxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Sun, 29 Nov 2009 10:39:03 +0100 |
| Cc: | givemefile@xxxxxxxx, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20091129020258.GA5168@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <20091128033325.5032D5C121@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20091128184250.GA30986@xxxxxxx> <20091129020258.GA5168@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.5.19 (2009-01-05) |
On 28.11.2009 18:02, Chris Wedgwood wrote: > On Sat, Nov 28, 2009 at 07:42:50PM +0100, Matthias Schniedermeyer wrote: > > > .el5 smells like Red Hat, Red Hat doesn't do XFS. > > At least in nothing that is currently released AFAIR. > > 5.4 has XFS I googled 5.4 and found a CERT that mentions 2.6.18-164. So i guess minimum kernel for 5.4 is way more recent than -128. So OP appears that have a pre 5.4 release running. Bis denn -- Real Programmers consider "what you see is what you get" to be just as bad a concept in Text Editors as it is in women. No, the Real Programmer wants a "you asked for it, you got it" text editor -- complicated, cryptic, powerful, unforgiving, dangerous. |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: please help me! thanks, Matthias Schniedermeyer |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: please help me! thanks, Peter Grandi |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: please help me! thanks, Matthias Schniedermeyer |
| Next by Thread: | Re: please help me! thanks, Peter Grandi |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |