xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: XFS support for ARMv5

To: Ofer Heifetz <oferh@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: XFS support for ARMv5
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2009 09:24:08 -0500
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Andy Poling <andy@xxxxxxxxxxx>, "xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx" <xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <EE71107DF0D1F24FA2D95041E64AB9E8985A59F895@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <14274282.01258546868484.JavaMail.root@wombat> <4B041AEE.4040506@xxxxxxxxxxx> <EE71107DF0D1F24FA2D95041E64AB9E8985A59F17F@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4B096C6E.8010508@xxxxxxxxxxx> <EE71107DF0D1F24FA2D95041E64AB9E8985A59F31F@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <alpine.DEB.2.00.0911251025490.28890@andydesk> <20091125210611.GA12150@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <EE71107DF0D1F24FA2D95041E64AB9E8985A59F895@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.19 (2009-01-05)
On Thu, Nov 26, 2009 at 04:19:39PM +0200, Ofer Heifetz wrote:
> Hi Christoph,
> 
> I applied the patches to 2.6.31.6 and the mount passes file. I copied some 
> data to the XFS DOK and had no problem reading the content after several 
> system reset.
> 
> Here is a dmesg snippet:
> 
> SGI XFS with ACLs, security attributes, large block/inode numbers, no debug 
> enabled
> XFS mounting filesystem sda3
> Starting XFS recovery on filesystem: sda3 (logdev: internal)
> Ending XFS recovery on filesystem: sda3 (logdev: internal)
> 
> Is this patch confirmed to be mainlined in 2.6.33?
> I need to know `cos I want to run some data integrity and performance tests 
> on this patch before I merge it.

There's no way to 100% confirm it until it's done, but it's firmly
planned.

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>