| To: | xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: xfs_repair question: "wrong" order of AG checks OK? |
| From: | Michael Monnerie <michael.monnerie@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Thu, 12 Nov 2009 00:29:21 +0100 |
| In-reply-to: | <475457384.356771257977851793.JavaMail.root@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Organization: | it-management http://it-management.at |
| References: | <475457384.356771257977851793.JavaMail.root@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| User-agent: | KMail/1.10.3 (Linux/2.6.31.4-ZMI; KDE/4.1.3; x86_64; ; ) |
On Mittwoch 11 November 2009 Nathan Scott wrote: > Could be xfs_repair running with multiple threads in parallel? Would it ever do that? There's no performance advantage in that, as that operation is disk I/O bound, isn't it? mfg zmi -- // Michael Monnerie, Ing.BSc ----- http://it-management.at // Tel: 0660 / 415 65 31 .network.your.ideas. // PGP Key: "curl -s http://zmi.at/zmi.asc | gpg --import" // Fingerprint: AC19 F9D5 36ED CD8A EF38 500E CE14 91F7 1C12 09B4 // Keyserver: wwwkeys.eu.pgp.net Key-ID: 1C1209B4 |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: xfs_repair question: "wrong" order of AG checks OK?, Nathan Scott |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: xfs_repair question: "wrong" order of AG checks OK?, Nathan Scott |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: xfs_repair question: "wrong" order of AG checks OK?, Nathan Scott |
| Next by Thread: | Re: xfs_repair question: "wrong" order of AG checks OK?, Nathan Scott |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |