[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [PATCH 1/2] add lpath_to_handle to libhandle

To: Alex Elder <aelder@xxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] add lpath_to_handle to libhandle
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 24 Oct 2009 22:52:23 -0400
Cc: xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20091024133729.GA23125@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <4AE08DC7.7000200@xxxxxxx> <1AB9A794DBDDF54A8A81BE2296F7BDFE83AE08@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20091024133729.GA23125@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.19 (2009-01-05)
On Sat, Oct 24, 2009 at 09:37:29AM -0400, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 23, 2009 at 01:08:37PM -0500, Alex Elder wrote:
> > Looks good.  I will up the version number after get this pulled in.
> > I will publish this and get the version number/dependency stuff
> > straightened out before I take the change for xfsrestore.
> Please hold back for a while with making a release.

So you made a relase without any communication to the developers and no
time to respon.  If this is the way SGI thinks they should work I think
it's time to make the kernel.org trees an official new xfsprogs-ng tree
and just ignore SGI.

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>