| To: | Amit Sahrawat <amit.sahrawat83@xxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: XFS internal error xfs_da_do_buf(1) at line 1992 of file fs/xfs/xfs_da_btree.c |
| From: | Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Thu, 22 Oct 2009 21:37:21 -0500 |
| Cc: | xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <c2dcdfa40910220955q586bdcabn268ddbc30d9b785d@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <c2dcdfa40910202307m77a9d7c5lf18e278a9ebae08e@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4ADF2EE8.6010700@xxxxxxxxxxx> <c2dcdfa40910211032y5b1d2cd8l418491327d24b87b@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4ADF4882.70106@xxxxxxxxxxx> <c2dcdfa40910220209v781f6a76u31e349ea461bc10a@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4AE06BAE.8090706@xxxxxxxxxxx> <c2dcdfa40910220930l19a8dab0y88e80630a2453b39@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4AE08AED.1020702@xxxxxxxxxxx> <c2dcdfa40910220955q586bdcabn268ddbc30d9b785d@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| User-agent: | Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (Macintosh/20090812) |
Amit Sahrawat wrote: that means it highely unlikey to get a fix for this issue :(Yes, backporting just doest not suits for me. I am trying to dig into the code, but really dont know if that's going to be that easy. Thanks Eric for all the help.W'll you know if I am able to fix this. One other thought on the backporting side; RHEL5.4 now has xfs merged into a 2.6.18-ish kernel. There are still some other supporting bits in that kernel, it's hardly vanilla 2.6.18, but if you want to try a backport route it might be one option. Testing an upstream kernel w/ your testcase in an emulator would also be a reasonable thing to do, I think. -eric Thanks & Regards, Amit Sahrawat |
| Previous by Date: | Re: 2.6.31+2.6.31.4: XFS - All I/O locks up to D-state after 24-48 hours (sysrq-t+w available), Dave Chinner |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Gewinnanspruch !, LA PRIMITIVA PROGRAM |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: XFS internal error xfs_da_do_buf(1) at line 1992 of file fs/xfs/xfs_da_btree.c, Amit Sahrawat |
| Next by Thread: | Re: XFS internal error xfs_da_do_buf(1) at line 1992 of file fs/xfs/xfs_da_btree.c, Amit Sahrawat |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |