[Top] [All Lists]

Re: XFS internal error xfs_da_do_buf(1) at line 1992 of file fs/xfs/xfs

To: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: XFS internal error xfs_da_do_buf(1) at line 1992 of file fs/xfs/xfs_da_btree.c
From: Amit Sahrawat <amit.sahrawat83@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2009 22:25:18 +0530
Cc: xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=1+gMFy6FxmQGHVPVQzzVaffuC2NIjyvDUlGwsFoJbnI=; b=lcfautQTTKyS6APykZztoMj/P5FSxcAnfA4HkQxrfqEZ0llrsIs4P43HhHZPhAMkEP eaxnCIFnFPuHeNxwq3t7r9iu04PyNG4fZ+5UjMb1hm7WXJs5gStW07ld19PHUi7dCRqd 7rGJhQexpT8ZwV+VbGzRWi7qLOUdHdY9hD9o0=
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=mYFWc8+ZyBIPF5VD+niOO6A8gCBycTu9vpdeqXt4TD7Adm1TZ6OC8NvazXGKvVad+U udEU0Fc+oKjsOCNKAErQEGJncvKomXlypjFZO6wY5oJQ8h9BRNNZZ15slYZHcYIKbicw xaRHjoLsymdjI2hMaJF5wH3L/MAQPxb6SSl7U=
In-reply-to: <4AE08AED.1020702@xxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <c2dcdfa40910202307m77a9d7c5lf18e278a9ebae08e@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4ADF2EE8.6010700@xxxxxxxxxxx> <c2dcdfa40910211032y5b1d2cd8l418491327d24b87b@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4ADF4882.70106@xxxxxxxxxxx> <c2dcdfa40910220209v781f6a76u31e349ea461bc10a@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4AE06BAE.8090706@xxxxxxxxxxx> <c2dcdfa40910220930l19a8dab0y88e80630a2453b39@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4AE08AED.1020702@xxxxxxxxxxx>
that means it highely unlikey to get a fix for this issue :(
Yes, backporting just doest not suits for me.
I am trying to dig into the code, but really dont know if that's going to be that easy.
Thanks Eric for all the help.
W'll you know if I am able to fix this.
Thanks & Regards,
Amit Sahrawat

On Thu, Oct 22, 2009 at 10:10 PM, Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Amit Sahrawat wrote:
> I am already using that patch.
> Other than using higher XFS version, can I try any other thing?
> I cannot directly use higher XFS version, I will have to backport the
> changes for higher to the kernel I am using  because of dependencies.

backporting xfs would be hard; I was hoping that perhaps you could just
boot a newer kernel, though I know w/ vendor arm kernels that can be tough.

There are drawbacks to not getting machine support upstream... :)

I don't really have other things for you to try, and don't have a lot of
time to debug 3 year old kernels either...  :(

You could try your arm testcase in a qemu emulator on a new kernel; if
that shows the same problem I'll be much more interested & motivated...


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>