xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [xfs-masters] Inconsistent {RECLAIM_FS-ON-R} -> {IN-RECLAIM_FS-W} us

To: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [xfs-masters] Inconsistent {RECLAIM_FS-ON-R} -> {IN-RECLAIM_FS-W} usage in XFS
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2009 10:30:22 +0200
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, xfs-masters@xxxxxxxxxxx, Vladislav Bolkhovitin <vst@xxxxxxxx>, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <4ADF36E3.8080801@xxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <4ACB3AC5.4010603@xxxxxxxx> <20091006131020.GA12343@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4ADF36E3.8080801@xxxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Mutt/1.3.28i
On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 11:29:23AM -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote:
> > The lockdep code to track this has been recently introduced.
> > 
> > I've sent some patches to fix it ages ago, but so far no one has
> > bothered to review them.
> 
> Christoph, remind me again which patch and I'll try to find time now
> that I'm getting Fedora bug reports.  :)

I've recentlhy sent out some even simpler patches to sort this out, see
here:

        http://oss.sgi.com/pipermail/xfs/2009-October/042857.html
        http://oss.sgi.com/pipermail/xfs/2009-October/042858.html

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>