On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 07:38:54PM -0400, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 11, 2009 at 09:43:09AM +0200, Patrick Schreurs wrote:
> > Hello Christoph,
> > Attached you'll find a screenshot from a 184.108.40.206 server, which includes
> > your patches and has XFS_DEBUG turned on. I truly hope this is useful to
> > you.
> Thanks. The patch below should fix the inode reclaim race that could
> lead to the double free you're seeing. To be applied ontop of all
> the other patches I sent you.
> Index: xfs/fs/xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_sync.c
> --- xfs.orig/fs/xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_sync.c 2009-10-11 19:09:43.828254119
> +++ xfs/fs/xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_sync.c 2009-10-12 13:48:14.886006087 +0200
> @@ -670,22 +670,22 @@ xfs_reclaim_inode(
> xfs_perag_t *pag = xfs_get_perag(ip->i_mount, ip->i_ino);
> - /* The hash lock here protects a thread in xfs_iget_core from
> - * racing with us on linking the inode back with a vnode.
> - * Once we have the XFS_IRECLAIM flag set it will not touch
> - * us.
> + /*
> + * The hash lock here protects a thread in xfs_iget from racing with
> + * us on recycling the inode. Once we have the XFS_IRECLAIM flag set
> + * it will not touch it.
> - write_lock(&pag->pag_ici_lock);
Did you mean to remove this write_lock? The patch does not remove