xfs
[Top] [All Lists]
<prev [Date] next>
[Advanced]
 <prev [Thread] next>

Re: XFS mount failuer on RAID5

from [Michael Monnerie] [Permanent Link][Original]
To: xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: XFS mount failuer on RAID5
From: Michael Monnerie <michael.monnerie@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 17 Oct 2009 23:27:04 +0200
In-reply-to: <4AD890D1.4010208@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Organization: it-management http://it-management.at
References: <389deec70910152009i7656aaf2s9d929b8b68e4e740@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <200910161019.10286@xxxxxx> <4AD890D1.4010208@xxxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: KMail/1.10.3 (Linux/2.6.31.3-ZMI; KDE/4.1.3; x86_64; ; ) 
On Freitag 16 Oktober 2009 Eric Sandeen wrote:
> Actually -ssize=4k is just fine even on 512 sector disks.

Oh funny. So what's the meaning of this argument then? Or why would one 
set it to 4k? What's the diff with 512b?

mfg zmi
-- 
// Michael Monnerie, Ing.BSc    -----      http://it-management.at
// Tel: 0660 / 415 65 31                      .network.your.ideas.
// PGP Key:         "curl -s http://zmi.at/zmi.asc | gpg --import"
// Fingerprint: AC19 F9D5 36ED CD8A EF38  500E CE14 91F7 1C12 09B4
// Keyserver: wwwkeys.eu.pgp.net                  Key-ID: 1C1209B4
[More with this subject...]
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date:  Re: XFS mount failuer on RAID5, Eric Sandeen
Next by Date:  2.6.31+2.6.31.4: XFS - All I/O locks up to D-state after 24-48 hours (sysrq-t+w available), Justin Piszcz
Previous by Thread:  Re: XFS mount failuer on RAID5, Eric Sandeen
Next by Thread:  Re: XFS mount failuer on RAID5, Dave Chinner
Indexes:  [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]