| To: | Michael Monnerie <michael.monnerie@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: XFS mount failuer on RAID5 |
| From: | Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Fri, 16 Oct 2009 10:27:13 -0500 |
| Cc: | xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <200910161019.10286@xxxxxx> |
| References: | <389deec70910152009i7656aaf2s9d929b8b68e4e740@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <200910161019.10286@xxxxxx> |
| User-agent: | Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (Macintosh/20090812) |
Michael Monnerie wrote: On Freitag 16 Oktober 2009 hank peng wrote:I don't know when "-ssize=4k" option is added, what is difference?You can set the *sector* size to 4k only when your drives have 4k sector size. Normal disks so far always have 512 Bytes/sector.mfg zmi Actually -ssize=4k is just fine even on 512 sector disks. -Eric |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | 2.6.31: xfs or md/raid1 bug in 2.6.31?, Justin Piszcz |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: XFS mount failuer on RAID5, Eric Sandeen |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: XFS mount failuer on RAID5, Michael Monnerie |
| Next by Thread: | Re: XFS mount failuer on RAID5, Michael Monnerie |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |