| To: | Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH 04/14] repair: split up scanfunc_ino |
| From: | Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 13 Oct 2009 18:23:50 -0400 |
| Cc: | Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <4AD4FDA8.6060705@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <20090902175531.469184575@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20090902175840.403232401@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4AD38C50.2060403@xxxxxxxxxxx> <20091013221946.GB31385@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4AD4FDA8.6060705@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.5.19 (2009-01-05) |
On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 05:22:32PM -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote:
> Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 03:06:40PM -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote:
> >>> + agno, agbno,
> >>> + mp->m_sb.sb_inopblock);
> >> pretty weird indentation here can't you just merge w/ previous line?
>
> I get that...
>
>
> +_("inode chunk claims used block, inobt block - agno %d, bno %d, inopb
> %d\n"),
> + agno, agbno,
> + mp->m_sb.sb_inopblock);
Yeah, you're right. I'll fix it up before commiting.
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH 04/14] repair: split up scanfunc_ino, Eric Sandeen |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Wrapped journal record corruption on read at recovery - patch attached (was Re: XFS corruption with failover), Christoph Hellwig |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [PATCH 04/14] repair: split up scanfunc_ino, Eric Sandeen |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [PATCH 05/14] repair: reduce byte swapping in scan_freelist, Eric Sandeen |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |