[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [PATCH 04/14] repair: split up scanfunc_ino

To: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 04/14] repair: split up scanfunc_ino
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2009 18:19:46 -0400
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <4AD38C50.2060403@xxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <20090902175531.469184575@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20090902175840.403232401@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4AD38C50.2060403@xxxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.19 (2009-01-05)
On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 03:06:40PM -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote:
>> +                                    agno, agbno,
>> +                            mp->m_sb.sb_inopblock);
> pretty weird indentation here can't you just merge w/ previous line?

XFS (especially userspace code) uses this in lots of places.  Gives
more space to messages but keeps the normal arguments normally aligned.

> Also is the change from bno to agbno intentional in the message?
> I guess it's fine.

That version is more correct.  Don't remember how it got in, though.

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>