| To: | Michael Monnerie <michael.monnerie@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Two XFS involving stack traces from Debian's 2.6.26-2-amd64 |
| From: | Stuart Rowan <strr-debian@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Thu, 01 Oct 2009 15:14:44 +0100 |
| Cc: | xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <200910011244.37489@xxxxxx> |
| References: | <4AC45B72.9060500@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <200910011244.37489@xxxxxx> |
| Reply-to: | strr-debian@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.1.4pre) Gecko/20090915 Thunderbird/3.0b4 |
Michael Monnerie wrote, on 01/10/09 11:44: On Donnerstag 01 Oktober 2009 Stuart Rowan wrote:umount /tmp/$from ; /sbin/lvremove -f /dev/$vgroup/snap-shot ; rmdir /tmp/$fromWhy don't you umount /tmp/$from&& /sbin/lvremove -f /dev/$vgroup/snap-shot&& rmdir /tmp/$from from your script so this won't happen again? Or make a loop around umount? mfg zmi Thanks, I've changed it as you suggested. It's true a second call to umount does unmount it (well it disappears from /proc/mounts anyway). However lvremove still does not succeed because it still believes the volume to be open. Cheers, Stu. |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Two XFS involving stack traces from Debian's 2.6.26-2-amd64, Stuart Rowan |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [PATCH] xfststests 220: test for prealloc/delalloc/reserved space recapture, Eric Sandeen |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Two XFS involving stack traces from Debian's 2.6.26-2-amd64, Stuart Rowan |
| Next by Thread: | RE: Two XFS involving stack traces from Debian's 2.6.26-2-amd64, Michael Monnerie |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |