xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Two XFS involving stack traces from Debian's 2.6.26-2-amd64

To: xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Two XFS involving stack traces from Debian's 2.6.26-2-amd64
From: Michael Monnerie <michael.monnerie@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2009 12:44:37 +0200
In-reply-to: <4AC45B72.9060500@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Organization: it-management http://it-management.at
References: <4AC45B72.9060500@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: KMail/1.10.3 (Linux/2.6.30.5-ZMI; KDE/4.1.3; x86_64; ; )
On Donnerstag 01 Oktober 2009 Stuart Rowan wrote:
> umount /tmp/$from ; /sbin/lvremove -f /dev/$vgroup/snap-shot ; rmdir
> /tmp/$from

Why don't you
umount /tmp/$from && /sbin/lvremove -f /dev/$vgroup/snap-shot && rmdir 
/tmp/$from
from your script so this won't happen again?
Or make a loop around umount?

mfg zmi
-- 
// Michael Monnerie, Ing.BSc    -----      http://it-management.at
// Tel: 0660 / 415 65 31                      .network.your.ideas.
// PGP Key:         "curl -s http://zmi.at/zmi.asc | gpg --import"
// Fingerprint: AC19 F9D5 36ED CD8A EF38  500E CE14 91F7 1C12 09B4
// Keyserver: wwwkeys.eu.pgp.net                  Key-ID: 1C1209B4

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>