| To: | Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH V2] xfs_repair: fix record_allocation list manipulation |
| From: | Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 22 Sep 2009 16:04:56 -0400 |
| Cc: | Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, xfs-oss <xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| In-reply-to: | <4AB8EB80.80707@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <4AB300CC.5020707@xxxxxxxxxxx> <4AB4EDBC.9050609@xxxxxxxxxxx> <20090922120231.GB8143@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4AB8EB80.80707@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.5.19 (2009-01-05) |
On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 10:21:36AM -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote: > > After reviewing it again I noticed that it can actually work > > the original code can work? Well, could in theory if fixed as in your patch ;-) > IF barry's speedups stuff obsoletes this work should I just put it on > the shelf for now? No, it doesn't. As I mentioned his original patches contained a fix like yours, but I left it out because I didn't understand it yet. I think the patch will cause some minor merge pain as it touches incore.c which gets more or less fully rewritten as part of the patch series. I think it's useful enough to be put in, but so are the other repair patches :) |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH V2] xfs_repair: fix record_allocation list manipulation, Eric Sandeen |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [PATCH 13/n] xfs: new truncate sequence, Christoph Hellwig |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [PATCH V2] xfs_repair: fix record_allocation list manipulation, Eric Sandeen |
| Next by Thread: | [PATCH] xfs_fsr: fix test for short write, Eric Sandeen |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |