| To: | Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: xfs compat_ioctl? |
| From: | Torsten Kaiser <just.for.lkml@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 1 Sep 2009 19:00:05 +0200 |
| Cc: | Michael Tokarev <mjt@xxxxxxxxxx>, Linux-kernel <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| Dkim-signature: | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=X4iTiJ/9yf/RnmXcsxWuABJK+RG2qQ6uUDeCOt8n98A=; b=VtBQWLYkOQOIauG80pyb/Qs1mARjFnjKPn0W44vXG/oOOOHTMFd4W3Tdf/B0CKwmVG N3mAn6beSQ19wwFPeUd8qXigSDPblxDNu+//Fzl+PcU2oYBFEs0pqp8Yaw0LxnWtv/q9 S2hZACgEu7NvJoZMqGS9eHu6oZaPa8sWBUhYk= |
| Domainkey-signature: | a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=KCes2ylM0V6xTWczlkfnnu43yuNhaZPolJE1iazHBZcqqNTDRYA/ByCbag4QfdK7i/ Xn6qADoWjbQYGb28ogkOxPaKuk+GxMfEhPqBmriNMbiYQCnwbLNFjyNPuoAuHxNBtMo/ 8r2BY7jsfs/q3We9FGVn/0vSMWfHJtvDZ9aDc= |
| In-reply-to: | <20090831182754.GA3620@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <4A9B759B.7020401@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20090831123010.GA2368@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <64bb37e0908311114t4a3cefc3v8ea5092e1558c578@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20090831182754.GA3620@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
On Mon, Aug 31, 2009 at 8:27 PM, Christoph Hellwig<hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I think you are right, the constant used is incorrect. Does the small
> patch below fix it for you?
Yes, after adding this patch, xfs_fsr works.
> Index: linux-2.6/fs/xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_ioctl32.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-2.6.orig/fs/xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_ioctl32.c 2009-08-31
> 15:25:06.093044591 -0300
> +++ linux-2.6/fs/xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_ioctl32.c 2009-08-31 15:25:10.856544216
> -0300
> @@ -619,7 +619,7 @@ xfs_file_compat_ioctl(
> case XFS_IOC_GETVERSION_32:
> cmd = _NATIVE_IOC(cmd, long);
> return xfs_file_ioctl(filp, cmd, p);
> - case XFS_IOC_SWAPEXT: {
> + case XFS_IOC_SWAPEXT_32: {
> struct xfs_swapext sxp;
> struct compat_xfs_swapext __user *sxu = arg;
>
>
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: zero size file after power failure with kernel 2.6.30.5, Emmanuel Florac |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: xfs compat_ioctl?, Eric Sandeen |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: xfs data loss, Peter Grandi |
| Next by Thread: | Re: xfs compat_ioctl?, Eric Sandeen |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |