| To: | Linux XFS <xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: zero size file after power failure with kernel 2.6.30.5 |
| From: | Emmanuel Florac <eflorac@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 1 Sep 2009 16:19:06 +0200 |
| In-reply-to: | <19100.63566.98250.185404@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Organization: | Intellique |
| References: | <200908292102.21710@xxxxxx> <4A99A80C.9010307@xxxxxxxxxxx> <19100.22644.149019.555685@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <200909010918.37886@xxxxxx> <19100.63566.98250.185404@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Le Tue, 1 Sep 2009 10:32:46 +0000 pg_xf2@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Peter Grandi) écrivait: > If that and having good scalable performance at the same time > requires having dual power supplies, redundant storage paths, > and battery backup, that is the typical platform on which XFS is > deployed. To mitigate this, I used systems with XFS daily for the last 13 years, (including IRIX workstations or PCs with only one drive) and had only once a problem clearly related to XFS (a well known bug, long corrected nowadays). -- ---------------------------------------- Emmanuel Florac | Intellique ---------------------------------------- |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: zero size file after power failure with kernel 2.6.30.5, Peter Grandi |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: xfs compat_ioctl?, Torsten Kaiser |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: zero size file after power failure with kernel 2.6.30.5, Peter Grandi |
| Next by Thread: | Re: zero size file after power failure with kernel 2.6.30.5, Michael Monnerie |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |