xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: pushing out a new xfsprogs release, was Re: [PATCH] xfsprogs: fix un

To: xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: pushing out a new xfsprogs release, was Re: [PATCH] xfsprogs: fix unaligned access in libxfs
From: Michael Monnerie <michael.monnerie@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 30 Aug 2009 10:44:03 +0200
In-reply-to: <4A99D43D.5050208@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Organization: it-management http://it-management.at
References: <20090828153718.GA26409@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <200908300017.07268@xxxxxx> <4A99D43D.5050208@xxxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: KMail/1.10.3 (Linux/2.6.30.5-ZMI; KDE/4.1.3; x86_64; ; )
On Sonntag 30 August 2009 Eric Sandeen wrote:
> Afraid I haven't fixed that one yet, sorry.  If you could open a bug
> on xfs.org's bugzilla it'd be much better for tracking ...

OK, looked there, but there are only 2 links: to kernel.org or 
oss.sgi.com bugzillas. Which one should I use?
BTW, wouldn't it be better to declare on the Wiki which bugzilla to use?

> I did find that building xfsprogs w/o debug ASSERTs turned on, I
> could get a clean fs after 2 runs, just to get you going again...

What would I need to take out exactly? Sorry, I don't know what "debug 
ASSERTs" are. I've seen from patches sent here those are commands, but 
which ones are for debug?

mfg zmi
-- 
// Michael Monnerie, Ing.BSc    -----      http://it-management.at
// Tel: 0660 / 415 65 31                      .network.your.ideas.
// PGP Key:         "curl -s http://zmi.at/zmi.asc | gpg --import"
// Fingerprint: AC19 F9D5 36ED CD8A EF38  500E CE14 91F7 1C12 09B4
// Keyserver: wwwkeys.eu.pgp.net                  Key-ID: 1C1209B4

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>