xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: xfs data loss

To: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: xfs data loss
From: "Passerone, Daniele" <Daniele.Passerone@xxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 29 Aug 2009 09:11:57 +0200
Accept-language: it-IT, en-US
Acceptlanguage: it-IT, en-US
Cc: "xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx" <xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <4A981133.6060009@xxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <B9A7B002C7FAFC469D4229539E909760308DA651DE@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4A975A35.3060809@xxxxxxxxxxx> <B9A7B002C7FAFC469D4229539E909760308DA65345@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4A981133.6060009@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Thread-index: AcooA3SC8DG5+cSzQ/WrnNCXoFSl1QAdHVZA
Thread-topic: xfs data loss
In particular, I don't understand why xfs_repair does not look for a secondary 
superblock

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>