| To: | Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | RE: xfs data loss |
| From: | "Passerone, Daniele" <Daniele.Passerone@xxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Sat, 29 Aug 2009 09:11:57 +0200 |
| Accept-language: | it-IT, en-US |
| Acceptlanguage: | it-IT, en-US |
| Cc: | "xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx" <xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| In-reply-to: | <4A981133.6060009@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <B9A7B002C7FAFC469D4229539E909760308DA651DE@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4A975A35.3060809@xxxxxxxxxxx> <B9A7B002C7FAFC469D4229539E909760308DA65345@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4A981133.6060009@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Thread-index: | AcooA3SC8DG5+cSzQ/WrnNCXoFSl1QAdHVZA |
| Thread-topic: | xfs data loss |
In particular, I don't understand why xfs_repair does not look for a secondary superblock |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | RE: xfs data loss, Passerone, Daniele |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: xfs data loss, Ralf Gross |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: xfs data loss, Ralf Gross |
| Next by Thread: | RE: xfs data loss, Passerone, Daniele |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |