[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Kernel XFS(..?) regression (& with/2.6.31-rc6)

To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Kernel XFS(..?) regression (& with/2.6.31-rc6)
From: Justin Piszcz <jpiszcz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2009 09:50:27 -0400 (EDT)
Cc: linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <alpine.DEB.2.00.0908240704130.9427@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <alpine.DEB.2.00.0908110624420.22426@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20090816022331.GA2309@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <alpine.DEB.2.00.0908171024380.12533@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <alpine.DEB.2.00.0908220624440.30321@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20090822142550.GA10003@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <alpine.DEB.2.00.0908221044420.30321@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20090822201558.GA17955@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <alpine.DEB.2.00.0908221645440.20848@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20090822205502.GA18904@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <alpine.DEB.2.00.0908221659030.23463@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20090823224504.GA19942@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <alpine.DEB.2.00.0908240704130.9427@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Alpine 2.00 (DEB 1167 2008-08-23)

On Mon, 24 Aug 2009, Justin Piszcz wrote:

On Sun, 23 Aug 2009, Christoph Hellwig wrote:

Ok, let's see where errors could happen then.

There are four theoretical possibilities:

(a) XFS
(b) loop driver
(c) crypto loop code
(d) block layer

Or combinations thereof.

I would take (a) and (d) as more unlikely as they tend to get used much
more and I would have heard more bug reports already.

The cryptoloop code hasn't changed at all since 2.6.29.

The loop code howver has a very interesting commit just after 2.6.39:

commit 68db1961bbf4e16c220ccec4a780e966bc1fece3
Author: Nikanth Karthikesan <knikanth@xxxxxxx>
Date:   Tue Mar 24 12:29:54 2009 +0100

   loop: support barrier writes

Can you try reverting this one (it cleanly reverse-applies against
2.6.30 and current mainline) and see if that makes a difference?

Hello Christoph,

# patch -p1 -R < ../unpatch.patch
patching file drivers/block/loop.c
Hunk #1 succeeded at 473 (offset -1 lines).
Hunk #2 succeeded at 804 (offset -22 lines).

Patched, we'll see if the problem recurs.. thanks!


Hi Christoph,

So far the uptime is 2 days, if it does not recur in the next 24-48 hours, do you recommend I follow up with the linux-crypto folks about this? It appears this could be the cause (no issues, as of yet).


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>