[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [PATCH, RFC] xfs: batched discard support

To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH, RFC] xfs: batched discard support
From: Mark Lord <liml@xxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2009 21:39:34 -0400
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@xxxxxxxxx>, Paul Mackerras <paulus@xxxxxxxxx>, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx, linux-fsdevel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-scsi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, jens.axboe@xxxxxxxxxx, IDE/ATA development list <linux-ide@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <20090819203916.GA25296@xxxxxxx>
Organization: Real-Time Remedies Inc.
References: <20090816004705.GA7347@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20090819203916.GA25296@xxxxxxx>
User-agent: Thunderbird (X11/20090608)
[resending, after fixing the Cc: list; somebody trimmed it earlier]

Jamie Lokier wrote:
I don't remember - does TRIM guarantee the blocks read zeros afterwards?

No, it doesn't.

A drive can optionally support "deterministic TRIM", whereby it will return
consistent data for any given trimmed sector afterwards, but that doesn't mean 


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>