On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 05:56:23PM -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote:
> It's pretty good still, the fundamental design is not substantially
> changed; you're more likely to find missing bits than "wrong" bits I think.
> has more info as well.
The fundamental design is mostly unchanged. What you might now want to
bother reading of the original documents are:
dir_design.pdf - the dir code has been completely replaced
threads.pdf - this is totally IRIX specific
scaffold.pdf - again mostly IRIX specific
message.pdf - no idea what this is at all, I never saw traces of this
For all others there's quite a bit of IRIXism in there.
Is there anything specific you're looking for?
> xfs mailing list
---end quoted text---