xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [PATCH] xfstests: 220 - generic quota sanity

To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] xfstests: 220 - generic quota sanity
From: Lachlan McIlroy <lmcilroy@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2009 21:59:45 -0400 (EDT)
Cc: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxx>, ext4 development <linux-ext4@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, xfs-oss <xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx>, Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <20090810160949.GA21948@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: Lachlan McIlroy <lmcilroy@xxxxxxxxxx>
----- "Christoph Hellwig" <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 09:05:17AM -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote:
> > Lachlan McIlroy wrote:
> > > This looks good Eric.
> > > 
> > > Is this test just for quota accounting or should it be testing
> quota
> > > enforcement too?
> > 
> > I guess 108 just did accounting; I was going to keep it parallel,
> and do
> > a different one for accounting, but it could be added to this as
> well.
> 
> Yeah, let's use a different one for enforement testing.

Agree, if quota enforcement isn't working correctly then the accounting
is the first thing to check so having seperate tests is a good idea.

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>