| To: | Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH] xfstests: 220 - generic quota sanity |
| From: | Lachlan McIlroy <lmcilroy@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Mon, 10 Aug 2009 21:59:45 -0400 (EDT) |
| Cc: | Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxx>, ext4 development <linux-ext4@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, xfs-oss <xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx>, Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| In-reply-to: | <20090810160949.GA21948@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Reply-to: | Lachlan McIlroy <lmcilroy@xxxxxxxxxx> |
----- "Christoph Hellwig" <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 09:05:17AM -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote: > > Lachlan McIlroy wrote: > > > This looks good Eric. > > > > > > Is this test just for quota accounting or should it be testing > quota > > > enforcement too? > > > > I guess 108 just did accounting; I was going to keep it parallel, > and do > > a different one for accounting, but it could be added to this as > well. > > Yeah, let's use a different one for enforement testing. Agree, if quota enforcement isn't working correctly then the accounting is the first thing to check so having seperate tests is a good idea. |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: XFS filesystem shutting down on linux 2.6.28.10 (xfs_rename), Eric Sandeen |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Best design docs for XFS, Christoph Hellwig |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [PATCH] xfstests: 220 - generic quota sanity, Christoph Hellwig |
| Next by Thread: | [PATCH V2 1/2] xfstests: split out xfs & generic quota existence tests, Eric Sandeen |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |