xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [PATCH] xfstests: 220 - generic quota sanity

To: Lachlan McIlroy <lmcilroy@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] xfstests: 220 - generic quota sanity
From: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2009 09:05:17 -0500
Cc: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxx>, ext4 development <linux-ext4@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, xfs-oss <xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <1871149413.1673471249881207275.JavaMail.root@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <1871149413.1673471249881207275.JavaMail.root@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.22 (Macintosh/20090605)
Lachlan McIlroy wrote:
> This looks good Eric.
> 
> Is this test just for quota accounting or should it be testing quota
> enforcement too?

I guess 108 just did accounting; I was going to keep it parallel, and do
a different one for accounting, but it could be added to this as well.

-Eric

> Lachlan
> 
> ----- "Eric Sandeen" <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
>> Add some very basic quota sanity tests for generic filesystems.
>>
>> This is based on test 108, but uses the generic quota tools,
>> not xfs_quota, and therefore cannot test project quota.
>>
>> Also, the IOs are much smaller (48k) so that ext3 won't get into
>> indirect blocks and throw off the accounting.  This does
>> assume 4k blocks though.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> ---

...

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>