|Subject:||Re: failed assertion related to realtime section|
|From:||Roman Kononov <kononov@xxxxxxxx>|
|Date:||Wed, 05 Aug 2009 18:07:50 -0500|
|User-agent:||Thunderbird 126.96.36.199 (X11/20090608)|
Eric Sandeen wrote:
While realtime should probably work and not oops (!) I'm curious what your use-case for realtime is?
In my setup I need mostly sequential read/write access to a number of huge files (>1GB) as well as small ones. My 16-disk system, providing 1GB/s of sequential access data rate, chokes when file fragments are smaller than ~32MB. Using 32MB extents of the regular data section helps, but fragmentation still develops. I hope (maybe I am wrong) that the realtime section with its fixed extents eliminates the fragmentation issue.
|<Prev in Thread]||Current Thread||[Next in Thread>|
|Previous by Date:||Re: [PATCH 1/1] XFS: xfs_iformat realtime device target pointer check, Felix Blyakher|
|Next by Date:||Re: failed assertion related to realtime section, Roman Kononov|
|Previous by Thread:||Re: failed assertion related to realtime section, Eric Sandeen|
|Next by Thread:||A recommendation from Mary Belle, zmak00|
|Indexes:||[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]|