On 2009-07-16 05:02, Olaf Weber wrote:
A quick test on an available system
running a (much) older kernel runs to completion, so this appears to
be a regression.
With which kernel version did you run the test?
Figuring out exactly when/where this regressed will take time.
I went back to 2.6.23 and the same assfail happened with somewhat different
call trace:
Assertion failed: xfs_trans_get_block_res(tp) > 0, file:
/home/rk/linux-2.6.23/fs/xfs/xfs_bmap.c, line: 5523
Call Trace:
[<ffffffff80356a08>] xfs_bunmapi+0x8e8/0x1060
[<ffffffff80227d2a>] dequeue_entity+0x7a/0xb0
[<ffffffff80380608>] xfs_itruncate_finish+0x398/0x5c0
[<ffffffff803a2323>] xfs_free_eofblocks+0x263/0x2b0
[<ffffffff803a4838>] xfs_release+0x118/0x1e0
[<ffffffff803ae42a>] xfs_file_release+0x1a/0x30
[<ffffffff802827cd>] __fput+0xcd/0x1e0
[<ffffffff8027f5c4>] filp_close+0x54/0x90
[<ffffffff80280e3d>] sys_close+0x9d/0x110
[<ffffffff8020bc9e>] system_call+0x7e/0x83
I tried to go back to 2.6.22.19 and older, and the test did not run at all
failing to mount:
XFS: bad version
XFS: SB validate failed
Any suggestions?
Roman
|