xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: kernel BUG at lib/radix-tree.c:464

To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: kernel BUG at lib/radix-tree.c:464
From: Christian Kujau <lists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2009 18:47:11 -0700 (PDT)
Cc: xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20090803210358.GA15109@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <alpine.DEB.2.01.0908022321060.5831@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20090803122440.GA11033@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <alpine.DEB.2.01.0908031340300.5831@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20090803210358.GA15109@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Alpine 2.01 (DEB 1184 2008-12-16)
On Mon, 3 Aug 2009 at 17:03, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> The latest patch is for 2.6.30, then one before is for the current
> git tree.

OK, got it. Applied and compiled OK now. But I was trying to reproduce 
this one first without the patch and creating a similar or even bigger 
workload on the box: well, the "box" is a netbook (1 GB RAM, 1.6GHz Atom) 
and right now there are running 4 instances of bonnie++, 1 tar, 1 
tiobench, 1 rsync all reading and writing from/to the same XFS partition 
as in my initial report, where only 1 rsync operation was in progress - 
which usually creates quite a lot I/O by itself, but I though I should 
hammer on the box a bit more to trigger this. Load is now at 13, far 
higher than it was yesterday, but no BUG or any sign of instability. (Hm, 
this is usually a good thing, right?)

So, yes - I could now boot again with the fix applied, but I'm not sure 
what to report then, as it's not visible that something would be "fixed".


Thanks,
Christian.
-- 
BOFH excuse #288:

Hard drive sleeping. Let it wake up on it's own...

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>