| To: | Christian Kujau <lists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: xfstests: nslookup not found |
| From: | Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Sun, 19 Jul 2009 20:16:37 -0400 |
| Cc: | Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <alpine.DEB.2.01.0907191653240.6439@bogon> |
| References: | <alpine.DEB.2.01.0907191050010.6439@bogon> <20090719182012.GA10936@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <alpine.DEB.2.01.0907191653240.6439@bogon> |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) |
On Sun, Jul 19, 2009 at 04:57:19PM -0700, Christian Kujau wrote: > On Sun, 19 Jul 2009 at 14:20, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > Can you resend a patch that just moves _get_fqdn and the check for > > nslookup from common* into the "new" script? > > If I understand correctly, maybe something like this would be acceptable? > > I was tempted to use "hostname -f" to give out the fqdn, but appaerently > not every hostname knows "-f" and I did not want to let the whole script > fail just because nslookup is not in place. Yes, that's exactly it. Can you resend it with a proper subject, description and add your Signed-off-by tag? |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: xfstests: nslookup not found, Christian Kujau |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [PATCH] don't fail if nslookup is not found (was: xfstests: nslookup not found), Christian Kujau |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: xfstests: nslookup not found, Christian Kujau |
| Next by Thread: | [PATCH] don't fail if nslookup is not found (was: xfstests: nslookup not found), Christian Kujau |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |