| To: | Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH, RFC] xfs: event tracing support |
| From: | Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Fri, 17 Jul 2009 10:09:55 -0400 |
| Cc: | Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Felix Blyakher <felixb@xxxxxxx>, linux-ia64@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx>, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <4A5FA82F.6050903@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <20090616214844.GA12310@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4E752C93-A674-4725-AF23-C227C0A1E659@xxxxxxx> <20090622205904.GA1855@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4A5FA82F.6050903@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) |
On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 05:22:39PM -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote: > Where are we at with this one, I'd like to get this in for XFS but I > agree w/ Felix that throwing out a "working" trace infrastructure w/ > nothing to replace it on ia64 would not be great. Well, it's not actuall working in these sense of that it isn't and never has been in mainline and also is utterly bit-rotted. I have absolutely no interested in keeping a tracing implementation away from mainline that just works out of the box (not just on x86 but also on powerpc and others) just because ia64 is too slow to get modern features. And it's not like we got any interesting amount of IA64 users, nor have does SGI who seems to be interested in IA64 do a lot of patches to XFS. |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH V3] reduce bmv_count in xfs_vn_fiemap, Olaf Weber |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [PATCH] xfs: event tracing support, Christoph Hellwig |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [PATCH, RFC] xfs: event tracing support, Steven Rostedt |
| Next by Thread: | re: £89 p.p./last minute training places, Sandra Keating |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |