xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: inconsistent lock state on 2.6.30?

To: Sage Weil <sage@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: inconsistent lock state on 2.6.30?
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2009 12:02:25 -0400
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20090626173558.GA402@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0906230925420.20462@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20090623170844.GA23971@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <Pine.LNX.4.64.0906241438100.24641@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20090626173558.GA402@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17)
FYI all these warnings are due to the new in reclaim state tracking
that was added to lockdep recently.  I now have a tree fixing all these
warnings including those two you see.  It's all still a bit hacky, but
I'll soon post a patch series to fix them all in one way or another.

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • Re: inconsistent lock state on 2.6.30?, Christoph Hellwig <=