| To: | Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH] xfstests: add tests to check log size scaling |
| From: | Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 07 Jul 2009 08:55:30 -0500 |
| Cc: | xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20090707104403.GA21747@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <20090705194111.GA3834@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4A52CAD6.1070807@xxxxxxxxxxx> <20090707104403.GA21747@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| User-agent: | Thunderbird 2.0.0.22 (Macintosh/20090605) |
Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Mon, Jul 06, 2009 at 11:11:02PM -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote: >> Any reason to do this on the scratch dir vs. the test dir? (Since >> scratch dir became optional, I figure stuff that can go on the test dev >> instead, probably should?) >> >> not a big deal, it looks fine otherwise. > > The test should work just fine using the test dir, and given that these > bits all cam from Dave I can't speak for his reason to use the scratch > dir. But given that even creating an empty 16TB filesystem uses up a > lot of space I'd rather have as much as possible free space available > instead of sharing it with an aged filesystem. Ok, it's fine by me as posted then, consider it reviewed. -Eric |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH] bump up nr_to_write in xfs_vm_writepage, Olaf Weber |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [PATCH] xfstests: don't print scratch mkfs and mount options without scratch device, Eric Sandeen |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [PATCH] xfstests: add tests to check log size scaling, Christoph Hellwig |
| Next by Thread: | [XFS updates] XFS development tree branch, master, updated. v2.6.30-rc4-1244-gb560634, xfs |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |