xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [PATCH, RFC] default to inode64 on 64-bit systems

To: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH, RFC] default to inode64 on 64-bit systems
From: Matthias Schniedermeyer <ms@xxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 7 Jul 2009 11:38:02 +0200
Cc: xfs mailing list <xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <4A52419E.5020301@xxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <4A52419E.5020301@xxxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.19 (2009-01-05)
On 06.07.2009 13:25, Eric Sandeen wrote:
> I'm tiring of telling people to use the inode64 mount option
> when they are experiencing bad performance on large xfs 
> filesystems...
> 
> 32-bit userspace is still largely broken when it comes to still
> using 32-bit stat calls, but on 64-bit systems this should be
> safe.
> 
> The only problem here is moving the disk onto a 32-bit system, or using
> 32-bit apps.  But I think it's a small risk.
> 
> What do we think about the following?

What is with people running 64bit kernel but 32bit Userspace?





Bis denn

-- 
Real Programmers consider "what you see is what you get" to be just as 
bad a concept in Text Editors as it is in women. No, the Real Programmer
wants a "you asked for it, you got it" text editor -- complicated, 
cryptic, powerful, unforgiving, dangerous.

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>