xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Clustered version of XFS

To: Felix Blyakher <felixb@xxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Clustered version of XFS
From: Tharindu Rukshan Bamunuarachchi <tharindu@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 5 Jul 2009 15:22:54 +0530
Cc: "Vitaly V. Ch" <vitaly.v.ch@xxxxxxxxx>, sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:sender:reply-to:received :in-reply-to:references:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject :from:to:cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=RjknxGa9GaF8deEIP2u3fV8/vHEca4gwCY4ImpFwWnA=; b=r0CbbbxL8zZjSqnK/btmDZ81NgyfHlh71+/jVzm09dofSGfNwerjN+1zJDuDGivuB1 SgN+Y1CJ5OSbFGj9F+fUQ/NOphWXLeuuAInCkvmR0tqZ5cmjOHgLvs0hEbgdP6qGyR9N mL55oGPuKDqJ7SZ65lWaoNV1xM+oL6bimRa3w=
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:reply-to:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=M8F/jry66fQbdecsmEhnmQlQmrL3gg4OpnOxtgAQb1T5qNE5n7yElPkm0oRVkcKs6a buTGQsFuzOu3a9tOBCgEVbXK25NPTGHIq+HQDZjXPnP/El/UQqO+gUMPxFBHAfCwS96o XrU/M/59cCvpvUVODD+3oLySC7b6zDxYwYyrw=
In-reply-to: <8B9C6BFA-0092-4AEA-9552-59A9291B68D9@xxxxxxx>
References: <7778c60e0907030557j357f88e5g4ab3ce0d3377bb41@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <6efe08af0907030741q3befbfc5m8c208249dd5cad15@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <7778c60e0907030824k723c4ddetdead0a1d43835476@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <8B9C6BFA-0092-4AEA-9552-59A9291B68D9@xxxxxxx>
Reply-to: tharindu@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sender: sentstory@xxxxxxxxx
thankx,

i want to believe that CXFS will perform same or better than XFS.
__
tharindu



On Sun, Jul 5, 2009 at 9:30 AM, Felix Blyakher<felixb@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Jul 3, 2009, at 10:24 AM, Tharindu Rukshan Bamunuarachchi wrote:
>
>> Thankx lot for your responses.
>>
>>
>> I recently send inqury over SGI website. Still no-reply.
>
> Today is a national holiday in US, and SGI was closed yesterday.
> I'm sure somebody will get back to you on Monday.
>
>> If there is someone related to SGI's CXFS in this list, please be kind
>> enough to provide contact details.
>
> I forwarded you inquiry to right channels. You should hear from
> SGI soon.
>
>> one of the world largest stock market likes to try out CXFS ....
>
> Hope you will like CXFS.
>
> Felix
>
>> __
>> tharindu
>>
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Jul 3, 2009 at 8:11 PM, Vitaly V. Ch<vitaly.v.ch@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Fri, Jul 3, 2009 at 3:57 PM, Tharindu Rukshan
>>> Bamunuarachchi<tharindu@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> we are using XFS high speed transaction processing system.
>>>>
>>>> we are very happy with XFS performance compared to ZFS, EXT3, JFS etc.
>>>>
>>>> i have two questions regarding XFS ...
>>>>
>>>> 1. Is there any cluster version of XFS. (e.g. like GFS, Luste, GPFS)
>>>
>>> Yes. Your need cxfs.
>>>
>>>> 2. I am currently using my root partition as XFS. but i need to modify
>>>> XFS source code and reload module without rebooting machine.
>>>>   Is there anyway to play with XFS source/module while using XFS
>>>> module for mounted file system ....?
>>>
>>> Yes. duplicate Your code and use non-reloadable copy for root fs and
>>> reloadable under other name ("my_xfs" for example) for other
>>> partitions.
>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> cheers
>>>> __
>>>> tharindu
>>>>
>>>
>>> \\wbr Vitaly Chernookiy
>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> xfs mailing list
>>>> xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
>>>> http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
>>>>
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> xfs mailing list
>> xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
>> http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
>
>

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>