| To: | "Vitaly V. Ch" <vitaly.v.ch@xxxxxxxxx>, sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Clustered version of XFS |
| From: | Tharindu Rukshan Bamunuarachchi <tharindu@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Fri, 3 Jul 2009 20:54:24 +0530 |
| Cc: | xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| Dkim-signature: | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:sender:reply-to:received :in-reply-to:references:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject :from:to:cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=EBREtgB9AWHugKVYWn+qtSkacg0xj2ByPzBBhug0O0A=; b=CXLqHtzB+5W3ZtS7kAnpzowS3c7Z/dpxuI/kxiJq1LUFj8c0ojE05CpQKM0U2SXjaq MI6bqaxaFEuoBlk8oiDE2LmAo7Kktx9uQfdxdV4GwT8QUpreEJX0CMikei5Xhdn42c5l A9U/yxjPt6WD2THYJ/FE/s6j2F/ZkWTZ8E92I= |
| Domainkey-signature: | a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:reply-to:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=Dln+CgDY0nneYQbz8Cf6Yv7ulRsaqOwYtd/6Aoj6/F93jej3L4BgEyK3t74PfMSQvV pg045GM7j4zb2AfPaG96IweCt2Wz23y/iF+a8MojKTng5nfUhlLR4AqRwpMZfevK25+n mRyULFMdRPaRG/HH65/AV3wEv6+71z3QtT9qU= |
| In-reply-to: | <6efe08af0907030741q3befbfc5m8c208249dd5cad15@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <7778c60e0907030557j357f88e5g4ab3ce0d3377bb41@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <6efe08af0907030741q3befbfc5m8c208249dd5cad15@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Reply-to: | tharindu@xxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| Sender: | sentstory@xxxxxxxxx |
Thankx lot for your responses.
I recently send inqury over SGI website. Still no-reply.
If there is someone related to SGI's CXFS in this list, please be kind
enough to provide contact details.
one of the world largest stock market likes to try out CXFS ....
__
tharindu
On Fri, Jul 3, 2009 at 8:11 PM, Vitaly V. Ch<vitaly.v.ch@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 3, 2009 at 3:57 PM, Tharindu Rukshan
> Bamunuarachchi<tharindu@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> we are using XFS high speed transaction processing system.
>>
>> we are very happy with XFS performance compared to ZFS, EXT3, JFS etc.
>>
>> i have two questions regarding XFS ...
>>
>> 1. Is there any cluster version of XFS. (e.g. like GFS, Luste, GPFS)
>
> Yes. Your need cxfs.
>
>> 2. I am currently using my root partition as XFS. but i need to modify
>> XFS source code and reload module without rebooting machine.
>> Is there anyway to play with XFS source/module while using XFS
>> module for mounted file system ....?
>
> Yes. duplicate Your code and use non-reloadable copy for root fs and
> reloadable under other name ("my_xfs" for example) for other
> partitions.
>
>>
>>
>> cheers
>> __
>> tharindu
>>
>
> \\wbr Vitaly Chernookiy
>
>> _______________________________________________
>> xfs mailing list
>> xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
>> http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
>>
>
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Clustered version of XFS, Vitaly V. Ch |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: bad fs - xfs_repair 3.01 crashes on it, Eric Sandeen |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Clustered version of XFS, Vitaly V. Ch |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Clustered version of XFS, Felix Blyakher |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |