xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [PATCH 3/3] xfstests: fallocate + read/write tests, ext4 regression

To: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] xfstests: fallocate + read/write tests, ext4 regression tests
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 21 Jun 2009 15:17:32 -0400
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, ext4 development <linux-ext4@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, xfs-oss <xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <58093.76.66.127.206.1245531627.squirrel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <4A370DD2.6080204@xxxxxxxxxxx> <20090620175953.GC3984@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <58093.76.66.127.206.1245531627.squirrel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17)
On Sat, Jun 20, 2009 at 04:00:27PM -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote:
> Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 10:13:22PM -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote:
> >> New test to test basic mixed fallocate + read & write,
> >> includes a couple regression tests for bugs that ext4
> >> hit.  Uses xfs_io to generate fallocate calls, so requires
> >> git xfsprogs and very recent glibc at this point.
> >
> > Looks good to me, and again does the correct notrun for my 32-bit
> > VM.  Guess I need to do the raw syscall wireup i xfsprogs eventually..
> 
> I don't mind doing it either ... how many arches? :)

Most important is x86 I think.  arm might be the other really important
candidate.

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>