| To: | Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: 2.6.30-06725: xfs_fsr: Assertion failed: ip->i_delayed_blks == 0, file: fs/xfs/xfs_bmap.c, line: 5991 |
| From: | Alexander Beregalov <a.beregalov@xxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Sat, 20 Jun 2009 22:17:25 +0400 |
| Cc: | Lachlan McIlroy <lmcilroy@xxxxxxxxxx>, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| Dkim-signature: | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=KHPIXd+Ca3HnWCHkp6ei7bO5l3Coo/tgs8lPJwTFFEs=; b=L5ugDtPbFd5xjZhlYn/4j48OQt0oJZ4lERH2Y3onsMl2i1cOaip6r0O9k5wSnVPz9n 7xJhazYCGp/Xl8w2uZSp6IJG2cDYqzzgJrm7f9KSJjSyJW3A7NVQTHYQ0Rc8GzMc58LA o1FmWzwGuH9P67DBZqNjOWxzbWbzXTXqppSPY= |
| Domainkey-signature: | a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=JgySZdRJMrqmwcCN8HxgcOO15Ulda4o+FMPS5maN+pIt9YjTQcuS89fzlWosV4dPzh F6LP8HIrNMYhTnFc+B0DGeux6pwgG+Tq7UETbd2afmbXSnOdmMjgjTRCFrT2IMQuNTCx AXwZDuQl/jTCf8o0mQdbbNB1OJOJuTU0scbHI= |
| In-reply-to: | <20090620180116.GD3984@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <941396568.292261245481145500.JavaMail.root@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <961884583.292281245481464174.JavaMail.root@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20090620180116.GD3984@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
2009/6/20 Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>: > On Sat, Jun 20, 2009 at 03:04:24AM -0400, Lachlan McIlroy wrote: >> Hi Alexander, >> >> I've seen this assertion before and if it's the problem I think it >> is then it should be fixed with this patch: >> >> http://oss.sgi.com/archives/xfs/2009-02/msg00176.html >> >> It shouldn't be difficult to test this too - If you run about 1024 >> dd writers to separate 100MB files and then run xfs_bmap on each >> file afterwards it should assert. > > Thas is in a filesystem not big enough to actually fit those files, > right? Might be worth adding a testcase like this.. > > Alex, can you give that patch a try? Yes, I have applied and testing it now. I will let you know. Thanks. |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: 2.6.30-06725: xfs_fsr: Assertion failed: ip->i_delayed_blks == 0, file: fs/xfs/xfs_bmap.c, line: 5991, Christoph Hellwig |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [PATCH 3/3] xfstests: fallocate + read/write tests, ext4 regression tests, Eric Sandeen |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: 2.6.30-06725: xfs_fsr: Assertion failed: ip->i_delayed_blks == 0, file: fs/xfs/xfs_bmap.c, line: 5991, Christoph Hellwig |
| Next by Thread: | Re: 2.6.30-06725: xfs_fsr: Assertion failed: ip->i_delayed_blks == 0, file: fs/xfs/xfs_bmap.c, line: 5991, Alexander Beregalov |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |