| To: | Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH 1/3] xfstests: basic fallocate boundary tests |
| From: | Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Sat, 20 Jun 2009 13:58:24 -0400 |
| Cc: | xfs-oss <xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx>, ext4 development <linux-ext4@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| In-reply-to: | <4A370C2C.6030404@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <4A370C2C.6030404@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) |
On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 10:06:20PM -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote: > This is just like test 072, but using fallocate instead > of the xfs ioctl. Just very basic fallocate tests. > > Also adds a "prealloc" group (./check -g prealloc) Looks good to me, and does the right thing on my 32 bit test VM (notrun) > +echo $testio | grep -q "not found" && \ > + _notrun "xfs_io fallocate support is missing" > +echo $testio | grep -q "Operation not supported" && \ > + _notrun "xfs_io fallocate command failed (old kernel? wrong fs?)" Maybe add a _require_fallocate as you need the same check in the next testcase? |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | [PATCH] xfstests: small common.config cleanup, Christoph Hellwig |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [PATCH 2/3] xfstests: move xfs_io filters to common.filter, Christoph Hellwig |
| Previous by Thread: | [PATCH 1/3] xfstests: basic fallocate boundary tests, Eric Sandeen |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [PATCH 1/3] xfstests: basic fallocate boundary tests, Eric Sandeen |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |