[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Bug#531950: attr: FTBFS on GNU/kFreeBSD

To: Petr Salinger <Petr.Salinger@xxxxxxxxx>, acl-devel@xxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Bug#531950: attr: FTBFS on GNU/kFreeBSD
From: Andreas Gruenbacher <agruen@xxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2009 17:37:57 +0200
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Aurelien Jarno <aurelien@xxxxxxxxxxx>, 531950-quiet@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx, Nathan Scott <nscott@xxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <Pine.LNX.4.62.0906151211550.15794@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Organization: SUSE Labs, Novell
References: <364917872.6081221244543493694.JavaMail.root@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20090615094244.GA4793@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <Pine.LNX.4.62.0906151211550.15794@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: KMail/1.10.3 (Linux/2.6.30-rc6-git3-4-pae; KDE/4.1.3; i686; ; )
On Monday 15 June 2009 12:26:12 Petr Salinger wrote:
> We would really appreciate to have either "#ifdef ENODATA" or
> "#ifdef __linux__" applied to current debian version of package.
> The debian maintainer does not want to diverge from (future) upstream,
> which is quite understandable.
> Would be possible to special case ENODATA as 1st step and postpone
> adding of syscall support later ?

Yes, done.

> The current situation (unbuildable attr under Bebian) prevents
> building of many other packages, namely kdelibs (and whole KDE 3.x),
> kde4libs (and whole KDE 4.x) and gnome-vfs (almost whole GNOME) and even
> vim editor under Debian GNU/kFreeBSD.


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>