| To: | Smit Shah <getsmit@xxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: XFS Preallocate using ALLOCSP |
| From: | Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 16 Jun 2009 12:32:39 -0500 |
| Cc: | Felix Blyakher <felixb@xxxxxxx>, linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <8770d98c0906161028j1cc5cbadl49d30092fddf3dbe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <24042506.post@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4A3712BF.7030101@xxxxxxxxxxx> <8770d98c0906152344p185533a9rc144a5667d13d2de@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4A37B744.9030301@xxxxxxxxxxx> <0B774481-16A5-42FC-89C3-91096E59E861@xxxxxxx> <8770d98c0906161028j1cc5cbadl49d30092fddf3dbe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| User-agent: | Thunderbird 2.0.0.21 (Macintosh/20090302) |
Smit Shah wrote: > On 6/16/09, Felix Blyakher <felixb@xxxxxxx> wrote: >> On Jun 16, 2009, at 10:16 AM, Eric Sandeen wrote: >>> Maybe I should ask what the end goal is here. :) >>> > Just to see if preallocation using fallocate helps reducing the > fragmentation and increases the throughput. I guess it wll help > reduce the fragmentation but the write performance is going to suffer. Depends on the IO you do, I think. I'd be curious to know exactly how you're running preallocation & iometer so I could give it a shot, to see why xfs seems to be doing worse than ext4. Thanks, -Eric |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: XFS Preallocate using ALLOCSP, Smit Shah |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: XFS Preallocate using ALLOCSP, Felix Blyakher |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: XFS Preallocate using ALLOCSP, Smit Shah |
| Next by Thread: | Re: XFS Preallocate using ALLOCSP, Smit Shah |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |