| To: | xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: grub no longer being maintained? so Suse drops support for XFS boot? |
| From: | Jason White <jason@xxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Fri, 12 Jun 2009 19:14:15 +1000 |
| Dkim-signature: | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=jasonjgw.net; s=mail; t=1244798055; bh=uc+D/7/FUKXmebBbAxN0MW1CA+3Z1fpAdY9Oo6Xn2QA=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:In-Reply-To; b=iQmyKS1rIe9e6Ongot+luR+wKwi95XdznDYl9TGpXcqIEJ8xr3ch9I4RppnKsM8Mq vckEukvcUPFsdg8zW10PtCSLvTP7agf0tPa5DDC+iaf9K+SNR+YBFrftjC0N/APgqY ZpLgvrN6Xt4ebfttH8qbV9epFkh8rTM8A5o4N9eQ= |
| In-reply-to: | <4A31F7FC.2020508@xxxxxxxxx> |
| Mail-followup-to: | xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| References: | <4A31E0FF.8050400@xxxxxxxxx> <921ca19c0906112227m2c834808jd62b15d0203fe4e3@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4A31F7FC.2020508@xxxxxxxxx> |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) |
Linda Walsh <suse@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Re: "Grub supposedly unable to start if /boot is on xfs partition, > So, because grub is broken, XFS is no longer supported as a boot > partition by Novell/SuSE. (!)... I should point out that I had to install it using the grub shell; running grub-install did not work. Interestingly, Ubuntu are moving to Grub 2 as their default boot loader, a precedent which other distributions may follow. (Disclaimer: I read the announcement, but I'm not a Ubuntu user.) |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Kernel 2.6.30: Memory/XFS leak, OOM killer kills many processes, Justin Piszcz |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: grub no longer being maintained? so Suse drops support for XFS boot?, Matthias Schniedermeyer |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: grub no longer being maintained? so Suse drops support for XFS boot?, Linda Walsh |
| Next by Thread: | Re: grub no longer being maintained? so Suse drops support for XFS boot?, Matthias Schniedermeyer |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |