Re: [PATCH] xfs_repair: catch bad depth in traverse_int_dir2block

[Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

Richard Kolkovich wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 09, 2009 at 12:38:35PM -0400, Eric Sandeen wrote:
>> Richard Kolkovich wrote:
>>> Guys,
>>>
>>> After applying the patch, we get much further.  xfs_repair then fails in 
>>> phase 7:
>>>
>>>
>>> xfs_repair: phase7.c:47: set_nlinks: Assertion `fs_inode_nlink' failed.
>>>
>>> Aborted
>>>
>>>
>>> Any ideas on that one?  Thanks!
>> Yep, I meant to reply, I hit that one too.  Haven't yet looked into that
>> one ....
>>
>> -Eric
> 
> Any ideas on a workaround if not a fix?  We really just want to get through 
> the repair and see what
> (if anything) is still usable...

Try setting the nlink feature on the superblock, which apparently got
lost... i'm not sure why repair doesn't cope but you can fix that:

xfs_db -x /device

xfs_db> sb 0
xfs_db> write versionnum 0x30A4

but then you'll hit something else I'm looking at, an inode moved to
lost+found which is still not referenced, grr.

-Eric