xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [PATCH] xfs_repair: catch bad depth in traverse_int_dir2block

To: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] xfs_repair: catch bad depth in traverse_int_dir2block
From: Richard Kolkovich <richard@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2009 16:47:51 -0500
Cc: "xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx" <xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <4A2E900B.3070100@xxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <4A2C8AD8.9030107@xxxxxxxxxxx> <20090608074230.GA28066@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20090609160622.GE63930@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4A2E900B.3070100@xxxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.19 (2009-01-05)
On Tue, Jun 09, 2009 at 12:38:35PM -0400, Eric Sandeen wrote:
> Richard Kolkovich wrote:
> > Guys,
> > 
> > After applying the patch, we get much further.  xfs_repair then fails in 
> > phase 7:
> > 
> > 
> > xfs_repair: phase7.c:47: set_nlinks: Assertion `fs_inode_nlink' failed.
> > 
> > Aborted
> > 
> > 
> > Any ideas on that one?  Thanks!
> 
> Yep, I meant to reply, I hit that one too.  Haven't yet looked into that
> one ....
> 
> -Eric

Any ideas on a workaround if not a fix?  We really just want to get through the 
repair and see what
(if anything) is still usable...

Thanks!

-- 

Richard Kolkovich
IntraMeta Corporation
richard@xxxxxxxxxxxxx

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>