Re: [PATCH] xfs_repair: catch bad depth in traverse_int

xfs

Re: [PATCH] xfs_repair: catch bad depth in traverse_int_dir2block

To:	Richard Kolkovich <richard@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject:	Re: [PATCH] xfs_repair: catch bad depth in traverse_int_dir2block
From:	Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date:	Tue, 09 Jun 2009 11:38:35 -0500
Cc:	xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to:	<20090609160622.GE63930@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References:	<4A2C8AD8.9030107@xxxxxxxxxxx> <20090608074230.GA28066@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20090609160622.GE63930@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent:	Thunderbird 2.0.0.21 (X11/20090320)

Richard Kolkovich wrote:
> Guys,
> 
> After applying the patch, we get much further.  xfs_repair then fails in 
> phase 7:
> 
> 
> xfs_repair: phase7.c:47: set_nlinks: Assertion `fs_inode_nlink' failed.
> 
> Aborted
> 
> 
> Any ideas on that one?  Thanks!

Yep, I meant to reply, I hit that one too.  Haven't yet looked into that
one ....

-Eric

[More with this subject...]

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
[PATCH] xfs_repair: catch bad depth in traverse_int_dir2block, Eric Sandeen Re: [PATCH] xfs_repair: catch bad depth in traverse_int_dir2block, Christoph Hellwig Re: [PATCH] xfs_repair: catch bad depth in traverse_int_dir2block, Richard Kolkovich Re: [PATCH] xfs_repair: catch bad depth in traverse_int_dir2block, Eric Sandeen <= Re: [PATCH] xfs_repair: catch bad depth in traverse_int_dir2block, Richard Kolkovich Re: [PATCH] xfs_repair: catch bad depth in traverse_int_dir2block, Eric Sandeen

Previous by Date:	Re: [PATCH] xfs_repair: catch bad depth in traverse_int_dir2block, Richard Kolkovich
Next by Date:	Re: xfs: use generic Posix ACL code, Eric Sandeen
Previous by Thread:	Re: [PATCH] xfs_repair: catch bad depth in traverse_int_dir2block, Richard Kolkovich
Next by Thread:	Re: [PATCH] xfs_repair: catch bad depth in traverse_int_dir2block, Richard Kolkovich
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]