[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Bug#531950: attr: FTBFS on GNU/kFreeBSD

To: Petr Salinger <Petr.Salinger@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Bug#531950: attr: FTBFS on GNU/kFreeBSD
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 9 Jun 2009 08:10:42 -0400
Cc: agruen@xxxxxxx, Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, 531950-quiet@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Nathan Scott <nscott@xxxxxxxxxx>, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <Pine.LNX.4.62.0906091328270.31325@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <364917872.6081221244543493694.JavaMail.root@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <Pine.LNX.4.62.0906091328270.31325@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17)
On Tue, Jun 09, 2009 at 01:35:58PM +0200, Petr Salinger wrote:
> The problem is that there is no ENODATA errno value defined
> on GNU/kFreeBSD. The errno values are determined by kernel,
> they are the same as on plain FreeBSD, used libc
> implementation does not change it.
> Another possibility is to use patch bellow.
> Does it looks acceptable for you ?

This one looks better to me, except that I would really make this
an explicit #ifdef __linux__.  The lack of a proper ENOATTR is
a Linux specific quirck and not related to the presence of
non-standard ENODATA.  Maybe also add a little comment why
we're doing this so people don't get confused by it.

Btw, how does libattr actually work for you on FreeBSD?  Last time
I checked FreeBSD had slightly different xattr system calls that (just
like IRIX) used an integer namespace value instead of the string prefix
in Linux.

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>