Re: [PATCH] xfstests: allow more xfs

xfs

Re: [PATCH] xfstests: allow more xfs_io tests to be generic

To:	Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject:	Re: [PATCH] xfstests: allow more xfs_io tests to be generic
From:	Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date:	Mon, 8 Jun 2009 19:25:59 -0400
Cc:	xfs mailing list <xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to:	<4A2D4F51.5050906@xxxxxxxxxx>
References:	<4A2D4F51.5050906@xxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent:	Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17)

On Mon, Jun 08, 2009 at 12:50:09PM -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote:
> What do folks think of this?  These tests just do generic
> reads & writes with xfs_io; if we add a "-F" they will run
> on other filesystems.

Looks good to me.  Btw, I really wonder if we want to keep the -F
flag to xfs_io.  Seems rather pointless to restrict
perfectly normal I/O to a single filesystem type.  And even for XFS
specific ioctls we'd get a good enough error code back to handle it.

[More with this subject...]

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
[PATCH] xfstests: allow more xfs_io tests to be generic, Eric Sandeen Re: [PATCH] xfstests: allow more xfs_io tests to be generic, Christoph Hellwig <= Re: [PATCH] xfstests: allow more xfs_io tests to be generic, Eric Sandeen

Previous by Date:	Re: [PATCH] xfstests: Allow fsx tests to run on generic filesystems, Felix Blyakher
Next by Date:	Fwd: Bug#531950: attr: FTBFS on GNU/kFreeBSD, Nathan Scott
Previous by Thread:	[PATCH] xfstests: allow more xfs_io tests to be generic, Eric Sandeen
Next by Thread:	Re: [PATCH] xfstests: allow more xfs_io tests to be generic, Eric Sandeen
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]