Re: [PATCH] xfstests: don't run 122 if required headers aren't found

xfs

Re: [PATCH] xfstests: don't run 122 if required headers aren't found

To:	Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject:	Re: [PATCH] xfstests: don't run 122 if required headers aren't found
From:	Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date:	Wed, 3 Jun 2009 15:35:54 -0400
Cc:	xfs mailing list <xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to:	<20090603175103.GA4538@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References:	<4A26B016.2080108@xxxxxxxxxx> <20090603175103.GA4538@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent:	Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17)

On Wed, Jun 03, 2009 at 01:51:03PM -0400, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 03, 2009 at 12:17:10PM -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote:
> > Now that libxfs etc is optional, 122 (which compiles on the fly)
> > is failing if those extra headers are missing.
> 
> Oh, the great 122 tests.  Indeed without all the headers defining
> the structures we can't actually check their size.
> 
> 
> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>

Umm, should be:

Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>

[More with this subject...]

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
[PATCH] xfstests: don't run 122 if required headers aren't found, Eric Sandeen Re: [PATCH] xfstests: don't run 122 if required headers aren't found, Christoph Hellwig Re: [PATCH] xfstests: don't run 122 if required headers aren't found, Christoph Hellwig <=

Previous by Date:	[PATCH] xfstests: Check for xlog_assign_lsn in xfs headers, Eric Sandeen
Next by Date:	Re: [PATCH V3] xfstests: add aio-dio-regress tests, Christoph Hellwig
Previous by Thread:	Re: [PATCH] xfstests: don't run 122 if required headers aren't found, Christoph Hellwig
Next by Thread:	Online training benefits for emergency responders, Richard Cohen
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]