Re: [PATCH] xfstests: Make the SCRATCH

xfs

Re: [PATCH] xfstests: Make the SCRATCH_DEV optional

To:	Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject:	Re: [PATCH] xfstests: Make the SCRATCH_DEV optional
From:	Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date:	Wed, 3 Jun 2009 13:19:04 -0400
Cc:	xfs mailing list <xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to:	<4A26AC60.6060401@xxxxxxxxxx>
References:	<4A26AC60.6060401@xxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent:	Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17)

On Wed, Jun 03, 2009 at 12:01:20PM -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote:
> Tests will fail gracefully if there is no SCRATCH_DEV defined, so change
> 
> the check script to allow it, and update README to reflect this.
> 
> This just makes it simpler to set up the tests, at the expense of
> coverage.
> 
> Long term it might be nice to allow either SCRATCH_DEV xor TEST_DEV
> to be missing, but for now this is simple.

Looks good,


Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>

[More with this subject...]

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
[PATCH] xfstests: Make the SCRATCH_DEV optional, Eric Sandeen Re: [PATCH] xfstests: Make the SCRATCH_DEV optional, Christoph Hellwig <=

Previous by Date:	[PATCH] xfstests: don't run 122 if required headers aren't found, Eric Sandeen
Next by Date:	Re: [PATCH] xfstests: don't run 122 if required headers aren't found, Christoph Hellwig
Previous by Thread:	[PATCH] xfstests: Make the SCRATCH_DEV optional, Eric Sandeen
Next by Thread:	[PATCH] xfstests: don't run 122 if required headers aren't found, Eric Sandeen
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]