xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [PATCH, RFC] xfsprogs: add xfs_reno(8)

To: xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [PATCH, RFC] xfsprogs: add xfs_reno(8)
From: Michael Monnerie <michael.monnerie@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 29 May 2009 08:37:06 +0200
In-reply-to: <20090528151804.GA31976@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Organization: it-management http://it-management.at
References: <20090528151804.GA31976@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: KMail/1.10.3 (Linux/2.6.29.2-ZMI; KDE/4.1.3; x86_64; ; )
On Donnerstag 28 Mai 2009 Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> The Linux port of xfs_reno

When used, does it move inodes on disk, or just change the numbers?

Because there seems to be still danger on inode64, would it be worth to 
sometimes run xfs_reno to get most files back to inode32, but still 
mount with inode64? I know this would create big inodes again, but at 
least old data would be safe.

mfg zmi
-- 
// Michael Monnerie, Ing.BSc    -----      http://it-management.at
// Tel: 0660 / 415 65 31                      .network.your.ideas.
// PGP Key:         "curl -s http://zmi.at/zmi.asc | gpg --import"
// Fingerprint: AC19 F9D5 36ED CD8A EF38  500E CE14 91F7 1C12 09B4
// Keyserver: wwwkeys.eu.pgp.net                  Key-ID: 1C1209B4

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>