| To: | linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Kernel crash with 2.6.29 + nfs + xfs (radix-tree) |
| From: | Martin Spott <Martin.Spott@xxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Wed, 27 May 2009 18:05:47 +0000 (UTC) |
| Newsgroups: | list.linux-xfs |
| Organization: | home |
| References: | <20090520003745.GA27491@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <gvjsr4$13l8$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| User-agent: | tin/1.9.3-20080506 ("Dalintober") (UNIX) (Linux/2.6.29.3 (x86_64)) |
Martin Spott wrote:
> After running 2.6.29.4 for one day now I have the feeling that the
> issue had been cured - [...]
Disregard - I just realized that the above statement is untrue,
Martin.
--
Unix _IS_ user friendly - it's just selective about who its friends are !
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Kernel crash with 2.6.29 + nfs + xfs (radix-tree), Martin Spott |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [PATCH 4/9] 069: make scratch mkfs quiet, Eric Sandeen |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Kernel crash with 2.6.29 + nfs + xfs (radix-tree), Martin Spott |
| Next by Thread: | inconsistent lock state on -rc6, Johannes Berg |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |