xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: EXT vs XFS at 80% filled filesystem

To: Milind <milind@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: EXT vs XFS at 80% filled filesystem
From: Theodore Tso <tytso@xxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 20 May 2009 10:20:38 -0400
Cc: linux-fsdevel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <1242820274.3457.12.camel@alhena>
References: <49F9565E.40804@xxxxxxxxx> <20090430183450.GB19276@xxxxxxx> <1242651808.3339.28.camel@alhena> <20090518131755.GJ32019@xxxxxxx> <1242798210.3457.4.camel@alhena> <20090520105011.GD3523@xxxxxxx> <1242820274.3457.12.camel@alhena>
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17)
On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 05:21:14PM +0530, Milind wrote:
> my CFLAGS are
> CFLAGS=-Wl,--dynamic-linker,/home/miline/toolchain/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/glibc-2.7/lib/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2,--rpath,/home/miline/toolchain/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/glibc-2.7/lib/
> 
> libuuid.so is supposed to have dependancy
> on 
> /home/miline/toolchain/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/glibc-2.7/lib/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2
>  (third entry in ldd output) right? And not on /lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2
> 
> I tried modifying as follows but didn't really work. Any comments?
> 

I suggest you read the man page for "ld", in particular for the option
--rpath-link....

                                                - Ted

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>